WeAreBrain vs Innowise: full comparison for 2026
Last updated: July 2026
Quick verdict
WeAreBrain (4.2/5) edges ahead of Innowise (3.8/5) overall. WeAreBrain is the better choice for companies wanting AI and machine learning delivered as part of a broader digital product build. Innowise is the stronger option for enterprises needing large-scale, low-cost nearshore staff augmentation with an ML and AI component. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
WeAreBrain vs Innowise: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | WeAreBrain | Innowise |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2015 | 2007 |
| HQ | Amsterdam, Netherlands | Warsaw, Poland |
| Team size | 51–200 | 1000+ |
| Rating | 4.2 / 5 | 3.8 / 5 |
| Best for | Companies wanting AI and machine learning delivered as part of a broader digital product build | Enterprises needing large-scale, low-cost nearshore staff augmentation with an ML and AI component |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, dedicated team | Staff augmentation, dedicated team, fixed project |
| Min. engagement | $25K | $20K |
| Primary tech stack | Python, AWS, Azure | Python, Java, .NET |
| Industries served | SaaS, Fintech, Enterprise, Retail | Fintech, Healthcare, E-commerce, Enterprise |
WeAreBrain vs Innowise: overview
WeAreBrain
WeAreBrain is an Amsterdam, Netherlands-headquartered digital product and AI agency founded in 2015 by Mario Grunitz, Elvire Jaspers, and Ievgen Miasushkin. The roughly 60 to 70 person team specializes in digital transformation, AI and machine learning applications, and intelligent process automation. In 2017, WeAreBrain co-founded Tur.ai, an AI and hyperautomation platform with joint Amsterdam and Kyiv operations, reflecting the founders' Ukrainian engineering ties.
Innowise
Innowise, also known as Innowise Group, founded in 2007 and headquartered in Warsaw, Poland, is a large IT outsourcing company with reported staff counts ranging from roughly 700 to over 3,000 depending on source and time period. Innowise offers AI and machine learning development as part of a broad custom software development, staff augmentation, and IT consulting portfolio spanning five continents.
Services and capabilities: WeAreBrain vs Innowise
| Capability | WeAreBrain | Innowise |
|---|---|---|
| ML model development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Computer vision | ✗ | ✗ |
| NLP | ✗ | ✗ |
| Generative AI / LLM integration | ✗ | ✗ |
| MLOps | ✓ | ✗ |
| AI strategy consulting | ✓ | ✓ |
| Staff augmentation | ✗ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: WeAreBrain vs Innowise
| Framework / platform | WeAreBrain | Innowise |
|---|---|---|
| Python | ✓ | ✓ |
| TensorFlow | ✓ | ✓ |
| PyTorch | N/A | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | ✓ |
| Kubernetes | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: WeAreBrain vs Innowise
| Criterion | WeAreBrain | Innowise |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | $25K | $20K |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team | Staff augmentation, Dedicated team, Fixed project |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Accessible | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: WeAreBrain vs Innowise
| Dimension | WeAreBrain | Innowise |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | SaaS, Fintech, Enterprise | Fintech, Healthcare, E-commerce |
| Best use cases | Building an AI-powered consumer-facing digital product, Intelligent process automation for back-office workflows | Large-scale staff augmentation for an ML engineering team, Cost-sensitive nearshore development with an AI component |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Staff augmentation |
WeAreBrain vs Innowise: pros and cons
| WeAreBrain | |
|---|---|
| + | A decade of operating history since founding in 2015 as an Amsterdam-based digital product agency |
| + | Co-founded a dedicated AI and hyperautomation platform, Tur.ai, showing deeper AI investment beyond client services |
| + | Combines product design with ML and AI engineering, useful for consumer-facing AI products |
| + | EU-headquartered in the Netherlands, simplifying GDPR compliance for European clients |
| - | AI and ML is one of several practice areas alongside broader digital product work |
| - | Some delivery ties to Kyiv, Ukraine via the Tur.ai venture carry the same continuity considerations as other Ukraine-linked firms |
| Innowise | |
|---|---|
| + | Nearly two decades of operating history since founding in 2007, with very large delivery scale |
| + | Broad staff augmentation offering useful for enterprises needing to scale ML teams quickly and cheaply |
| + | Presence across five continents provides flexible time-zone coverage |
| + | Lower minimum engagement size than several other large generalist firms on this list |
| - | Reported employee counts vary substantially across sources, from roughly 700 to over 3,000, reflecting limited public transparency |
| - | AI and ML is one service line within a very broad generalist IT outsourcing portfolio, not a specialist focus |
| - | Volume-outsourcing model may deliver less senior-level attention than boutique ML specialists |
Who should choose WeAreBrain?
WeAreBrain is the right choice for companies wanting AI and machine learning delivered as part of a broader digital product build.
Digital product agency DNA combined with a dedicated AI, ML, and intelligent automation practice. Minimum engagement starts at $25K. Works best with clients in SaaS, Fintech, Enterprise, Retail.
Who should choose Innowise?
Innowise is the right choice for enterprises needing large-scale, low-cost nearshore staff augmentation with an ML and AI component.
Very large delivery scale and broad geographic reach, positioned for volume staff augmentation over specialist ML depth. Minimum engagement starts at $20K. Works best with clients in Fintech, Healthcare, E-commerce, Enterprise.
Decision matrix: WeAreBrain vs Innowise
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | WeAreBrain |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | WeAreBrain |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Innowise |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | WeAreBrain |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Innowise |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | WeAreBrain |
Use case fit: WeAreBrain vs Innowise
| Use case | WeAreBrain fit | Innowise fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Building an AI-powered consumer-facing digital product | Strong | Limited | WeAreBrain |
| Intelligent process automation for back-office workflows | Strong | Limited | WeAreBrain |
| Large-scale staff augmentation for an ML engineering team | Limited | Strong | Innowise |
| Cost-sensitive nearshore development with an AI component | Limited | Strong | Innowise |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Strong | Innowise |
Verdict: WeAreBrain vs Innowise
WeAreBrain (4.2/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Machine Learning Development projects. Digital product agency DNA combined with a dedicated AI, ML, and intelligent automation practice. It is best for companies wanting AI and machine learning delivered as part of a broader digital product build.
Innowise (3.8/5) is the better choice when enterprises needing large-scale, low-cost nearshore staff augmentation with an ML and AI component. If your situation matches those criteria, Innowise is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
WeAreBrain vs Innowise FAQ
Is WeAreBrain better than Innowise?
WeAreBrain (4.2/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. WeAreBrain is better for companies wanting AI and machine learning delivered as part of a broader digital product build. Innowise is better for enterprises needing large-scale, low-cost nearshore staff augmentation with an ML and AI component.
How do WeAreBrain and Innowise differ in pricing?
WeAreBrain uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $25K. Innowise uses staff augmentation, dedicated team, fixed project pricing with a minimum engagement of $20K. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: WeAreBrain or Innowise?
WeAreBrain is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between WeAreBrain and Innowise?
WeAreBrain's primary differentiator is: digital product agency dna combined with a dedicated ai, ml, and intelligent automation practice. Innowise's primary differentiator is: very large delivery scale and broad geographic reach, positioned for volume staff augmentation over specialist ml depth. They also differ in team size (51–200 vs 1000+), minimum engagement ($25K vs $20K), and primary industries served (SaaS, Fintech vs Fintech, Healthcare).
Last reviewed: July 2026. Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.