Siili Solutions vs Transparity: full comparison for 2026
Last updated: July 2026
Quick verdict
Siili Solutions (3.7/5) edges ahead of Transparity (3.7/5) overall. Siili Solutions is the better choice for nordic and European enterprises wanting a publicly listed, financially transparent IT consultancy partner. Transparity is the stronger option for uK enterprises fully standardized on Microsoft Azure wanting AI transformation through a certified Microsoft partner. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Siili Solutions vs Transparity: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Siili Solutions | Transparity |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2005 | 2015 |
| HQ | Helsinki, Finland | United Kingdom |
| Team size | 501–1000 | 201–500 |
| Rating | 3.7 / 5 | 3.7 / 5 |
| Best for | Nordic and European enterprises wanting a publicly listed, financially transparent IT consultancy partner | UK enterprises fully standardized on Microsoft Azure wanting AI transformation through a certified Microsoft partner |
| Pricing model | Dedicated team, retainer, fixed project | Retainer, fixed project, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | $30K | $30K |
| Primary tech stack | Python, Java, AWS | Azure ML, Azure OpenAI Service, Power BI |
| Industries served | Enterprise, Telecommunications, Financial Services, Retail | Insurance, Financial Services, Enterprise, Public Sector |
Siili Solutions vs Transparity: overview
Siili Solutions
Siili Solutions Oyj, founded in 2005 and headquartered in Helsinki, Finland, is a publicly listed IT consultancy on Nasdaq Helsinki (ticker SIILI) with 500 to over 1,000 employees across 19 locations. Siili offers software development, digital transformation, and machine learning services, and expanded its AI and digital product capabilities in part through its 2020 acquisition of Budapest-based Supercharge, disclosed here as an ownership change affecting Siili's broader group structure.
Transparity
Transparity, founded in 2015 by David Jobbins and Colin Macandrew, is a UK-headquartered Microsoft pureplay technology partner with around 289 employees. The company delivers AI and machine learning transformation primarily through Microsoft Azure and Copilot technologies via its proprietary AI Factory framework, as demonstrated in its Bordereaux Sync project built with Charles Taylor InsureTech.
Services and capabilities: Siili Solutions vs Transparity
| Capability | Siili Solutions | Transparity |
|---|---|---|
| ML model development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Computer vision | ✗ | ✗ |
| NLP | ✗ | ✗ |
| Generative AI / LLM integration | ✗ | ✗ |
| MLOps | ✗ | ✓ |
| AI strategy consulting | ✓ | ✓ |
| Staff augmentation | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Siili Solutions vs Transparity
| Framework / platform | Siili Solutions | Transparity |
|---|---|---|
| Python | ✓ | N/A |
| TensorFlow | N/A | N/A |
| PyTorch | N/A | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | N/A |
| Azure | ✓ | ✓ |
| Kubernetes | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Siili Solutions vs Transparity
| Criterion | Siili Solutions | Transparity |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | $30K | $30K |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Retainer, Fixed project | Retainer, Fixed project, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Accessible | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Siili Solutions vs Transparity
| Dimension | Siili Solutions | Transparity |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Enterprise, Telecommunications, Financial Services | Insurance, Financial Services, Enterprise |
| Best use cases | Enterprise digital transformation with an ML component, Nordic-region software development and data engineering | Azure-native AI transformation for an insurance or financial services client, Microsoft Copilot deployment across enterprise workflows |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Retainer |
Siili Solutions vs Transparity: pros and cons
| Siili Solutions | |
|---|---|
| + | Publicly listed on Nasdaq Helsinki, providing financial transparency and stability signals |
| + | Two decades of operating history since founding in 2005, with a large, established Nordic footprint |
| + | 19 office locations support broad European coverage and delivery flexibility |
| + | Expanded AI and digital product capability via its 2020 acquisition of Supercharge in Budapest |
| - | AI and ML is one practice within a much broader generalist IT consultancy portfolio |
| - | 2020 acquisition of Supercharge represents a group ownership change worth understanding before engaging that subsidiary specifically |
| - | Larger public-company structure may mean less flexibility than privately held boutiques |
| Transparity | |
|---|---|
| + | Deep Microsoft pureplay partnership status with a proprietary AI Factory delivery framework |
| + | Demonstrated production case study, Bordereaux Sync, built with Charles Taylor InsureTech |
| + | A decade of operating history since founding in 2015, with a growing UK enterprise client base |
| + | Strong fit for insurance and financial services clients needing Azure-based compliance |
| - | Azure-exclusive positioning is a poor fit for clients on AWS, GCP, or open-source ML stacks |
| - | AI and ML transformation is delivered through a broader Microsoft cloud consulting practice rather than as a standalone ML specialization |
| - | Smaller named public case study base than larger, longer-established firms on this list |
Who should choose Siili Solutions?
Siili Solutions is the right choice for nordic and European enterprises wanting a publicly listed, financially transparent IT consultancy partner.
Publicly traded on Nasdaq Helsinki, offering financial transparency uncommon among privately held ML firms. Minimum engagement starts at $30K. Works best with clients in Enterprise, Telecommunications, Financial Services, Retail.
Who should choose Transparity?
Transparity is the right choice for uK enterprises fully standardized on Microsoft Azure wanting AI transformation through a certified Microsoft partner.
Proprietary AI Factory framework built specifically around Microsoft Azure and Copilot technologies. Minimum engagement starts at $30K. Works best with clients in Insurance, Financial Services, Enterprise, Public Sector.
Decision matrix: Siili Solutions vs Transparity
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Siili Solutions |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Siili Solutions |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Siili Solutions |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Siili Solutions |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Siili Solutions |
Use case fit: Siili Solutions vs Transparity
| Use case | Siili Solutions fit | Transparity fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise digital transformation with an ML component | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Nordic-region software development and data engineering | Strong | Limited | Siili Solutions |
| Azure-native AI transformation for an insurance or financial services client | Limited | Strong | Transparity |
| Microsoft Copilot deployment across enterprise workflows | Limited | Strong | Transparity |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Siili Solutions vs Transparity
Siili Solutions (3.7/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Machine Learning Development projects. Publicly traded on Nasdaq Helsinki, offering financial transparency uncommon among privately held ML firms. It is best for nordic and European enterprises wanting a publicly listed, financially transparent IT consultancy partner.
Transparity (3.7/5) is the better choice when uK enterprises fully standardized on Microsoft Azure wanting AI transformation through a certified Microsoft partner. If your situation matches those criteria, Transparity is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Siili Solutions vs Transparity FAQ
Is Siili Solutions better than Transparity?
Siili Solutions (3.7/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Siili Solutions is better for nordic and European enterprises wanting a publicly listed, financially transparent IT consultancy partner. Transparity is better for uK enterprises fully standardized on Microsoft Azure wanting AI transformation through a certified Microsoft partner.
How do Siili Solutions and Transparity differ in pricing?
Siili Solutions uses dedicated team, retainer, fixed project pricing with a minimum engagement of $30K. Transparity uses retainer, fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $30K. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Siili Solutions or Transparity?
Siili Solutions is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Siili Solutions and Transparity?
Siili Solutions's primary differentiator is: publicly traded on nasdaq helsinki, offering financial transparency uncommon among privately held ml firms. Transparity's primary differentiator is: proprietary ai factory framework built specifically around microsoft azure and copilot technologies. They also differ in team size (501–1000 vs 201–500), minimum engagement ($30K vs $30K), and primary industries served (Enterprise, Telecommunications vs Insurance, Financial Services).
Last reviewed: July 2026. Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.