Best Machine Learning Development Companies in Europe

Probayes vs DEPT: full comparison for 2026

Last updated: July 2026

Quick verdict

Probayes (4.1/5) edges ahead of DEPT (4.0/5) overall. Probayes is the better choice for automotive, defense, and finance clients needing rigorous Bayesian and predictive-modeling expertise. DEPT is the stronger option for large enterprise brands needing ML-driven marketing personalization at global scale. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.

Probayes vs DEPT: head-to-head summary

Criterion Probayes DEPT
Founded 2003 2015
HQ Montbonnot-Saint-Martin (Grenoble), France Amsterdam, Netherlands
Team size 51–200 1000+
Rating 4.1 / 5 4.0 / 5
Best for Automotive, defense, and finance clients needing rigorous Bayesian and predictive-modeling expertise Large enterprise brands needing ML-driven marketing personalization at global scale
Pricing model Retainer, fixed project Retainer, dedicated team
Min. engagement $25K $75K
Primary tech stack Python, R, Bayesian modeling frameworks Python, GCP, AWS
Industries served Automotive, Defense, Financial Services, Healthcare Retail, Media, Enterprise, E-commerce

Probayes vs DEPT: overview

Probayes

Probayes, based in Montbonnot-Saint-Martin near Grenoble, France, is a private AI and data science company founded in 2003. With around 86 employees, Probayes specializes in Bayesian modeling, predictive analysis, and optimization for the automotive, defense, finance, and health sectors, making it one of the longest continuously operating AI-focused firms in this list.

DEPT

DEPT, founded in Amsterdam in 2015, has grown into a global digital agency with over 4,000 digital specialists across more than 30 offices on five continents, backed by the Carlyle Group. DEPT's AI-enabled marketing technology platform, Ada, and its Engineering practice deliver machine learning-driven personalization, growth, and data engineering work for major brands including Google, TikTok, and eBay. As a large, private-equity-backed marketing and engineering agency, ML and AI here sits within a much broader full-service offering rather than being the firm's sole focus.

Services and capabilities: Probayes vs DEPT

Capability Probayes DEPT
ML model development
Computer vision
NLP
Generative AI / LLM integration
MLOps
AI strategy consulting
Staff augmentation

Tech stack comparison: Probayes vs DEPT

Framework / platform Probayes DEPT
Python
TensorFlow N/A
PyTorch N/A N/A
AWS
Azure N/A
Kubernetes N/A N/A

Pricing comparison: Probayes vs DEPT

Criterion Probayes DEPT
Minimum engagement $25K $75K
Engagement models Retainer, Fixed project Retainer, Dedicated team
Rate transparency Minimum disclosed Minimum disclosed
Price tier Accessible Accessible

Target audience comparison: Probayes vs DEPT

Dimension Probayes DEPT
Best company size Startup to mid-market Startup to mid-market
Best industries Automotive, Defense, Financial Services Retail, Media, Enterprise
Best use cases Predictive maintenance modeling for automotive systems, Bayesian risk modeling for finance or defense applications ML-driven marketing personalization at global brand scale, Enterprise data engineering supporting a large media or retail platform
Typical project type Retainer Retainer

Probayes vs DEPT: pros and cons

Probayes
+ Over two decades of operating history since founding in 2003, one of the longest-running AI specialists on this list
+ Deep, rigorous expertise in Bayesian modeling and predictive optimization rather than trend-driven AI positioning
+ Established presence in demanding regulated sectors like defense and automotive
+ Located in the Grenoble tech corridor, a recognized French deep-tech hub
- Bayesian and predictive-analytics specialization is narrower than firms covering the full modern generative AI stack
- Smaller regional presence in the Grenoble area versus Paris- or Amsterdam-based firms with broader visibility
DEPT
+ Global scale of over 4,000 specialists across 30-plus offices, unmatched by any other firm on this list
+ Proprietary AI-enabled marketing technology platform, Ada, with proven enterprise brand clients
+ Carlyle Group backing provides financial stability for very large, long-term programmes
+ Named clients include Google, TikTok, KFC, and eBay, indicating enterprise-grade delivery capacity
- ML and AI sits within a much broader marketing and full-service digital agency offering, not a dedicated ML practice
- High minimum engagement size, inaccessible for startups or small businesses
- Enterprise agency structure means less specialized, boutique-style ML research depth

Who should choose Probayes?

Probayes is the right choice for automotive, defense, and finance clients needing rigorous Bayesian and predictive-modeling expertise.

Over two decades of specialization in Bayesian AI and predictive analytics, predating the current ML and AI boom. Minimum engagement starts at $25K. Works best with clients in Automotive, Defense, Financial Services, Healthcare.

Who should choose DEPT?

DEPT is the right choice for large enterprise brands needing ML-driven marketing personalization at global scale.

Proprietary AI marketing platform, Ada, and global scale of over 4,000 specialists across 30-plus offices, unmatched by any other firm on this list. Minimum engagement starts at $75K. Works best with clients in Retail, Media, Enterprise, E-commerce.

Decision matrix: Probayes vs DEPT

Your situation Recommended choice
You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope Probayes
You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme DEPT
Your budget is at the lower end Probayes
You need specialist depth in a specific vertical Probayes
You need staff augmentation or team extension Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug
You need consulting before committing to a build Probayes

Use case fit: Probayes vs DEPT

Use case Probayes fit DEPT fit Winner
Predictive maintenance modeling for automotive systems Strong Limited Probayes
Bayesian risk modeling for finance or defense applications Strong Limited Probayes
ML-driven marketing personalization at global brand scale Limited Strong DEPT
Enterprise data engineering supporting a large media or retail platform Limited Strong DEPT
Fixed-price build Limited Limited Both equally
Staff augmentation Limited Limited Both equally

Verdict: Probayes vs DEPT

Probayes (4.1/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Machine Learning Development projects. Over two decades of specialization in Bayesian AI and predictive analytics, predating the current ML and AI boom. It is best for automotive, defense, and finance clients needing rigorous Bayesian and predictive-modeling expertise.

DEPT (4.0/5) is the better choice when large enterprise brands needing ML-driven marketing personalization at global scale. If your situation matches those criteria, DEPT is a competitive option.

Related comparisons

Probayes vs DEPT FAQ

Is Probayes better than DEPT?

Probayes (4.1/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Probayes is better for automotive, defense, and finance clients needing rigorous Bayesian and predictive-modeling expertise. DEPT is better for large enterprise brands needing ML-driven marketing personalization at global scale.

How do Probayes and DEPT differ in pricing?

Probayes uses retainer, fixed project pricing with a minimum engagement of $25K. DEPT uses retainer, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $75K. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.

Which is better for enterprise: Probayes or DEPT?

Probayes is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.

What are the main differences between Probayes and DEPT?

Probayes's primary differentiator is: over two decades of specialization in bayesian ai and predictive analytics, predating the current ml and ai boom. DEPT's primary differentiator is: proprietary ai marketing platform, ada, and global scale of over 4,000 specialists across 30-plus offices, unmatched by any other firm on this list. They also differ in team size (51–200 vs 1000+), minimum engagement ($25K vs $75K), and primary industries served (Automotive, Defense vs Retail, Media).

Last reviewed: July 2026. Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.