Best Machine Learning Development Companies in Europe

Digica vs DEPT: full comparison for 2026

Last updated: July 2026

Quick verdict

Digica (4.1/5) edges ahead of DEPT (4.0/5) overall. Digica is the better choice for regulated-industry clients such as automotive, defence, and medical needing ML software with embedded systems expertise. DEPT is the stronger option for large enterprise brands needing ML-driven marketing personalization at global scale. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.

Digica vs DEPT: head-to-head summary

Criterion Digica DEPT
Founded 2009 2015
HQ Altrincham, UK Amsterdam, Netherlands
Team size 51–200 1000+
Rating 4.1 / 5 4.0 / 5
Best for Regulated-industry clients such as automotive, defence, and medical needing ML software with embedded systems expertise Large enterprise brands needing ML-driven marketing personalization at global scale
Pricing model Fixed project, dedicated team Retainer, dedicated team
Min. engagement $30K $75K
Primary tech stack Python, C++, TensorFlow Python, GCP, AWS
Industries served Automotive, Defense, Medical Devices, Telecommunications Retail, Media, Enterprise, E-commerce

Digica vs DEPT: overview

Digica

Digica, founded in 2009 and legally headquartered in Altrincham, UK, provides AI and machine learning software services with additional delivery centers in Lodz, Poland; Berlin, Germany; and San Jose, California. With over 70 engineers, Digica has trained thousands of machine learning models (3,673 per company website; independently unverifiable) for regulated industries including automotive, defence, and medical devices.

DEPT

DEPT, founded in Amsterdam in 2015, has grown into a global digital agency with over 4,000 digital specialists across more than 30 offices on five continents, backed by the Carlyle Group. DEPT's AI-enabled marketing technology platform, Ada, and its Engineering practice deliver machine learning-driven personalization, growth, and data engineering work for major brands including Google, TikTok, and eBay. As a large, private-equity-backed marketing and engineering agency, ML and AI here sits within a much broader full-service offering rather than being the firm's sole focus.

Services and capabilities: Digica vs DEPT

Capability Digica DEPT
ML model development
Computer vision
NLP
Generative AI / LLM integration
MLOps
AI strategy consulting
Staff augmentation

Tech stack comparison: Digica vs DEPT

Framework / platform Digica DEPT
Python
TensorFlow
PyTorch N/A
AWS
Azure N/A
Kubernetes N/A N/A

Pricing comparison: Digica vs DEPT

Criterion Digica DEPT
Minimum engagement $30K $75K
Engagement models Fixed project, Dedicated team Retainer, Dedicated team
Rate transparency Minimum disclosed Minimum disclosed
Price tier Accessible Accessible

Target audience comparison: Digica vs DEPT

Dimension Digica DEPT
Best company size Startup to mid-market Startup to mid-market
Best industries Automotive, Defense, Medical Devices Retail, Media, Enterprise
Best use cases ML model development for automotive ADAS systems, Medical device AI software requiring regulatory compliance ML-driven marketing personalization at global brand scale, Enterprise data engineering supporting a large media or retail platform
Typical project type Fixed project Retainer

Digica vs DEPT: pros and cons

Digica
+ Over 15 years of operating history since founding in 2009, in regulated, safety-critical industries
+ Combines ML expertise with embedded systems and IoT engineering, unusual among ML-only firms
+ Multi-country delivery footprint across the UK, Poland, Germany, and the US for coverage flexibility
+ Legally headquartered in the UK with EU delivery centers for GDPR-relevant work
- High-volume model-training claims, per company website, are not independently auditable
- Regulated-industry focus may mean longer sales and compliance cycles than consumer-facing ML firms
- Mid-size team of over 70 engineers spread across four countries
DEPT
+ Global scale of over 4,000 specialists across 30-plus offices, unmatched by any other firm on this list
+ Proprietary AI-enabled marketing technology platform, Ada, with proven enterprise brand clients
+ Carlyle Group backing provides financial stability for very large, long-term programmes
+ Named clients include Google, TikTok, KFC, and eBay, indicating enterprise-grade delivery capacity
- ML and AI sits within a much broader marketing and full-service digital agency offering, not a dedicated ML practice
- High minimum engagement size, inaccessible for startups or small businesses
- Enterprise agency structure means less specialized, boutique-style ML research depth

Who should choose Digica?

Digica is the right choice for regulated-industry clients such as automotive, defence, and medical needing ML software with embedded systems expertise.

Combines ML model development with embedded systems and IoT engineering for regulated hardware-adjacent industries. Minimum engagement starts at $30K. Works best with clients in Automotive, Defense, Medical Devices, Telecommunications.

Who should choose DEPT?

DEPT is the right choice for large enterprise brands needing ML-driven marketing personalization at global scale.

Proprietary AI marketing platform, Ada, and global scale of over 4,000 specialists across 30-plus offices, unmatched by any other firm on this list. Minimum engagement starts at $75K. Works best with clients in Retail, Media, Enterprise, E-commerce.

Decision matrix: Digica vs DEPT

Your situation Recommended choice
You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope Digica
You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme Digica
Your budget is at the lower end Digica
You need specialist depth in a specific vertical Digica
You need staff augmentation or team extension Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug
You need consulting before committing to a build Digica

Use case fit: Digica vs DEPT

Use case Digica fit DEPT fit Winner
ML model development for automotive ADAS systems Strong Strong Both equally
Medical device AI software requiring regulatory compliance Strong Limited Digica
ML-driven marketing personalization at global brand scale Limited Strong DEPT
Enterprise data engineering supporting a large media or retail platform Limited Strong DEPT
Fixed-price build Limited Limited Both equally
Staff augmentation Limited Limited Both equally

Verdict: Digica vs DEPT

Digica (4.1/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Machine Learning Development projects. Combines ML model development with embedded systems and IoT engineering for regulated hardware-adjacent industries. It is best for regulated-industry clients such as automotive, defence, and medical needing ML software with embedded systems expertise.

DEPT (4.0/5) is the better choice when large enterprise brands needing ML-driven marketing personalization at global scale. If your situation matches those criteria, DEPT is a competitive option.

Related comparisons

Digica vs DEPT FAQ

Is Digica better than DEPT?

Digica (4.1/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Digica is better for regulated-industry clients such as automotive, defence, and medical needing ML software with embedded systems expertise. DEPT is better for large enterprise brands needing ML-driven marketing personalization at global scale.

How do Digica and DEPT differ in pricing?

Digica uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $30K. DEPT uses retainer, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $75K. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.

Which is better for enterprise: Digica or DEPT?

Digica is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.

What are the main differences between Digica and DEPT?

Digica's primary differentiator is: combines ml model development with embedded systems and iot engineering for regulated hardware-adjacent industries. DEPT's primary differentiator is: proprietary ai marketing platform, ada, and global scale of over 4,000 specialists across 30-plus offices, unmatched by any other firm on this list. They also differ in team size (51–200 vs 1000+), minimum engagement ($30K vs $75K), and primary industries served (Automotive, Defense vs Retail, Media).

Last reviewed: July 2026. Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.