Best Machine Learning Development Companies in Europe

DATAFOREST vs DEPT: full comparison for 2026

Last updated: July 2026

Quick verdict

DATAFOREST (4.1/5) edges ahead of DEPT (4.0/5) overall. DATAFOREST is the better choice for small and mid-market businesses needing data engineering plus ML analytics as a combined offering. DEPT is the stronger option for large enterprise brands needing ML-driven marketing personalization at global scale. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.

DATAFOREST vs DEPT: head-to-head summary

Criterion DATAFOREST DEPT
Founded 2018 2015
HQ Kyiv, Ukraine Amsterdam, Netherlands
Team size 51–200 1000+
Rating 4.1 / 5 4.0 / 5
Best for Small and mid-market businesses needing data engineering plus ML analytics as a combined offering Large enterprise brands needing ML-driven marketing personalization at global scale
Pricing model Fixed project, dedicated team Retainer, dedicated team
Min. engagement $15K $75K
Primary tech stack Python, Airflow, AWS Python, GCP, AWS
Industries served E-commerce, SaaS, Fintech, Healthcare Retail, Media, Enterprise, E-commerce

DATAFOREST vs DEPT: overview

DATAFOREST

DATAFOREST is a data science and software development agency founded in 2018, headquartered in Kyiv, Ukraine, with an additional office in New York. The company, with an estimated 50 to 249 employees, provides ETL pipelines, data analytics, and custom machine learning solutions, and has been recognized by The Manifest as a top-reviewed IT agency in Ukraine, per company website; independently unverifiable.

DEPT

DEPT, founded in Amsterdam in 2015, has grown into a global digital agency with over 4,000 digital specialists across more than 30 offices on five continents, backed by the Carlyle Group. DEPT's AI-enabled marketing technology platform, Ada, and its Engineering practice deliver machine learning-driven personalization, growth, and data engineering work for major brands including Google, TikTok, and eBay. As a large, private-equity-backed marketing and engineering agency, ML and AI here sits within a much broader full-service offering rather than being the firm's sole focus.

Services and capabilities: DATAFOREST vs DEPT

Capability DATAFOREST DEPT
ML model development
Computer vision
NLP
Generative AI / LLM integration
MLOps
AI strategy consulting
Staff augmentation

Tech stack comparison: DATAFOREST vs DEPT

Framework / platform DATAFOREST DEPT
Python
TensorFlow N/A
PyTorch N/A N/A
AWS
Azure N/A N/A
Kubernetes N/A N/A

Pricing comparison: DATAFOREST vs DEPT

Criterion DATAFOREST DEPT
Minimum engagement $15K $75K
Engagement models Fixed project, Dedicated team Retainer, Dedicated team
Rate transparency Minimum disclosed Minimum disclosed
Price tier Accessible Accessible

Target audience comparison: DATAFOREST vs DEPT

Dimension DATAFOREST DEPT
Best company size Startup to mid-market Startup to mid-market
Best industries E-commerce, SaaS, Fintech Retail, Media, Enterprise
Best use cases Building ETL pipelines feeding a downstream ML model, Predictive analytics for e-commerce customer behavior ML-driven marketing personalization at global brand scale, Enterprise data engineering supporting a large media or retail platform
Typical project type Fixed project Retainer

DATAFOREST vs DEPT: pros and cons

DATAFOREST
+ Combines core data engineering (ETL and pipelines) with ML analytics under one team
+ Growing review base and recognition from The Manifest as a top-reviewed Ukraine IT agency
+ Competitive pricing relative to Western European ML firms
+ New York office adds coverage for US-based clients
- Kyiv, Ukraine-based delivery carries the same operational-continuity considerations as other Ukraine-linked firms
- Founded in 2018, a shorter track record than more established European ML consultancies
- Data engineering heritage means the ML practice is comparatively newer within the firm
DEPT
+ Global scale of over 4,000 specialists across 30-plus offices, unmatched by any other firm on this list
+ Proprietary AI-enabled marketing technology platform, Ada, with proven enterprise brand clients
+ Carlyle Group backing provides financial stability for very large, long-term programmes
+ Named clients include Google, TikTok, KFC, and eBay, indicating enterprise-grade delivery capacity
- ML and AI sits within a much broader marketing and full-service digital agency offering, not a dedicated ML practice
- High minimum engagement size, inaccessible for startups or small businesses
- Enterprise agency structure means less specialized, boutique-style ML research depth

Who should choose DATAFOREST?

DATAFOREST is the right choice for small and mid-market businesses needing data engineering plus ML analytics as a combined offering.

Combined data engineering (ETL) and ML analytics practice with a growing review base. Minimum engagement starts at $15K. Works best with clients in E-commerce, SaaS, Fintech, Healthcare.

Who should choose DEPT?

DEPT is the right choice for large enterprise brands needing ML-driven marketing personalization at global scale.

Proprietary AI marketing platform, Ada, and global scale of over 4,000 specialists across 30-plus offices, unmatched by any other firm on this list. Minimum engagement starts at $75K. Works best with clients in Retail, Media, Enterprise, E-commerce.

Decision matrix: DATAFOREST vs DEPT

Your situation Recommended choice
You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope DATAFOREST
You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme DATAFOREST
Your budget is at the lower end DATAFOREST
You need specialist depth in a specific vertical DATAFOREST
You need staff augmentation or team extension Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug
You need consulting before committing to a build DATAFOREST

Use case fit: DATAFOREST vs DEPT

Use case DATAFOREST fit DEPT fit Winner
Building ETL pipelines feeding a downstream ML model Strong Limited DATAFOREST
Predictive analytics for e-commerce customer behavior Strong Limited DATAFOREST
ML-driven marketing personalization at global brand scale Limited Strong DEPT
Enterprise data engineering supporting a large media or retail platform Limited Strong DEPT
Fixed-price build Limited Limited Both equally
Staff augmentation Limited Limited Both equally

Verdict: DATAFOREST vs DEPT

DATAFOREST (4.1/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Machine Learning Development projects. Combined data engineering (ETL) and ML analytics practice with a growing review base. It is best for small and mid-market businesses needing data engineering plus ML analytics as a combined offering.

DEPT (4.0/5) is the better choice when large enterprise brands needing ML-driven marketing personalization at global scale. If your situation matches those criteria, DEPT is a competitive option.

Related comparisons

DATAFOREST vs DEPT FAQ

Is DATAFOREST better than DEPT?

DATAFOREST (4.1/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. DATAFOREST is better for small and mid-market businesses needing data engineering plus ML analytics as a combined offering. DEPT is better for large enterprise brands needing ML-driven marketing personalization at global scale.

How do DATAFOREST and DEPT differ in pricing?

DATAFOREST uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $15K. DEPT uses retainer, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $75K. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.

Which is better for enterprise: DATAFOREST or DEPT?

DATAFOREST is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.

What are the main differences between DATAFOREST and DEPT?

DATAFOREST's primary differentiator is: combined data engineering (etl) and ml analytics practice with a growing review base. DEPT's primary differentiator is: proprietary ai marketing platform, ada, and global scale of over 4,000 specialists across 30-plus offices, unmatched by any other firm on this list. They also differ in team size (51–200 vs 1000+), minimum engagement ($15K vs $75K), and primary industries served (E-commerce, SaaS vs Retail, Media).

Last reviewed: July 2026. Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.